Why is my CV being rejected?
You have the track record. You're the right fit. But you're getting silence or generic rejections: here's why.
If you're applying to roles you're genuinely qualified for and either hearing nothing back or getting standard rejection emails, the problem isn't your experience: it's how your CV or resume is being interpreted by both ATS systems and human recruiters.
You're not imagining it
This pattern is common among qualified professionals in the job market
You apply to ideal roles
The scope matches your background. You could step into this role and deliver results. Your resume or CV seems perfect.
Rejection or silence
Either no response or a generic email. Your application goes nowhere.
You question everything
Is my positioning unclear? Am I being filtered out unfairly? What am I missing in my strategy?
The pattern continues
You apply to more roles. Same outcome. Your confidence wavers. Time to optimize.
88% of qualified candidates are lost in the machine
88% of employers report losing qualified candidates due to ATS configuration, not candidate quality. Automated systems reject qualified candidates because of how their CV is structured and positioned.
View researchWhat actually happens to your CV
The journey involves two distinct filters: understanding both is critical
Your CV faces two gates: First, the ATS technical filter (most experienced professionals pass this easily). Then, the recruiter strategic filter where strong CVs actually die.
ATS filter (technical)
Scans for keywords, file format compatibility, and standard section headings. Systems like Workday, Taleo, and Greenhouse use these filters.
Recruiter filter (strategic)
Evaluates role clarity, seniority fit, risk signals, and executive presence. This is where strong CVs often fail.
The 7 real reasons your CV gets rejected
Understanding which filter is blocking you and how to fix it
88% of employers lose qualified candidates due to ATS configuration, not candidate quality.
Technical filter issues (Gate 1: ATS)
ATS can't parse your formatting
Strategic filter issues (Gate 2: Recruiter)
Role identity isn't clear
Seniority signals don't match
CV shows what you did, not why you're the right hire
You trigger execution risk signals
Overqualification without narrative control
Which filter is blocking you?
If you're getting rejections, you're likely passing Gate 1 (ATS) but failing Gate 2 (recruiter screening). Your biggest opportunity is in role clarity.
What you can do about it
This is completely fixable once you know what to look for
✓ Check your CV
✓ Get specific feedback
✓ Optimize for each job
Find out why your CV is being rejected
Upload your CV and get an instant ATS compatibility report. See exactly what's wrong and fix it in under 3 minutes.
Check my CV now (free)Your privacy matters: We don't store or share your CV.
Join thousands of professionals who improved their positioning
""Finally understood why I wasn't getting callbacks. The positioning issues were invisible to me.""
Stefano, Operations Director
""The role clarity feedback was a game changer. I had no idea my CV was confusing recruiters.""
James, Commercial Lead
""Showed me exactly where my corporate language was creating risk. Fixed it and got hired.""
Rebecca, Transformation Director
Common questions
Run through this checklist to identify your specific issues
Ask yourself:
Role identity: Can a recruiter describe your profile in one clear sentence?
Seniority alignment: Does your CV scope match the target role level?
Motivation clarity: Does your summary explain why this role makes sense now?
Outcome translation: Are accomplishments framed as hiring outcomes?
Risk management: Have you translated corporate experience into practical delivery?
Appropriate length: Is your CV the right length for your experience level?
Consistency: Is your LinkedIn profile aligned with your CV?
If you answered 'no' or 'unsure' to more than two items, your CV has clarity issues.
JobMentis results
About this guide
This guide is developed by the JobMentis team, specialists in career technology. Our analysis draws from patterns observed across thousands of submissions.
Our methodology
We analyze rejection patterns by reviewing outcomes from systems like Workday, Taleo, and Greenhouse. Our recommendations focus on the intersection of technical compatibility and strategic positioning.