🎨 CVs That Look Designed
A tester told us our CV templates “still look like Word, circa 2010”. They were right, and it was on purpose.
A CV has two readers, and they want opposite things. When you apply through a careers site or a job board, software reads it first. It works through every line in order, and it needs one clean column with your name at the top. Anything clever in the layout risks it misreading your career. For that reader, plain is correct. But when you email a CV directly, get referred, follow up after a networking chat or bring a copy to the interview, a person reads it first. To a person, that same plain column looks like a document nobody designed.
Until now we only built for the first reader. Our gallery even said “All templates are ATS compliant”. That was true, and it was the problem. So the gallery now has two groups, and each one says when to use it:
- Built for ATS. For careers sites and job boards. It keeps the parser-safe layout but takes typography seriously, with five new designs: Meridian, Ledger, Atelier, Folio and Zürich.
- Designed for people. For direct emails, referrals and the interview table. These three are laid out from scratch rather than restyled. Signal runs your details down a full-height colour rail and puts your work on a timeline. Monograph is set like a book, with a drop cap and dates in a wide margin. Raster is a Swiss poster, with a very large name and a strict grid.
It should be hard to send the wrong one to the wrong reader. Designs for people carry a “For people” tag and are marked as not optimised when we know the job goes through an ATS. We never recommend one. And their Word download is always a plain layout any parser can read, so even a slip does not cost you the application.
- A recommendation that says why. Almost every CV ever made here used the same template, because it was the default and nobody chose it. Now the picker suggests a design based on what we know about the application and tells you the reason. An older enterprise hiring system gets the most conservative layout, because being read at all matters more than looking good. A long career gets Ledger, and a direct application in Europe gets Atelier.
- The picker shows your own CV in every design, set in your font and colour. What you see on the card is the page that prints.
- You choose the font, the accent colour and how tightly it is set, and every accent colour is checked for legibility so the text stays readable.
- Eight designs take an optional photo, placed where each design wants it. You can add, change or remove it right on the CV.
We also retired twelve old templates that were really one design in different colours. If your CV used one of them, it still opens and exports exactly as before.
🇨🇭 Applying in Switzerland?
A CV is not the same document everywhere. A Swiss recruiter looks for things a British or American one never asks about: a photo, a proper level for every language you claim, at least one national language, references, and where you stand on a work permit. Nothing in the product told you any of that. We found a real CV built on our Zürich design with languages written as “fluent”, no German anywhere, and no references.
So when you are working on a design made for Switzerland, or applying from there, the editor offers a check. It stays one quiet line until you open it.
- It only gives a verdict where it can actually check. Photo on or off, a real level or “native” for every language, whether you list a national language, whether you have references. For the things your CV has no field for, like your permit, the work certificates a Swiss dossier is expected to include, or the two-to-three page norm, it gives you the tip and leaves the judgement to you. Guessing your permit from free text would tick a box that might not be true.
- It says when German is missing, because most roles around Zurich, Basel and Bern ask for it.
- Every check ends in a link that takes you to the fix. It scrolls to that part of your CV, flashes it, and puts the cursor where you need to type. If the section is hidden or does not exist yet, it opens or adds it first, so the link never leaves you somewhere empty.
- A new personal details line sits under your contact details, for your permit status. In Germany the same line is where availability or a driving licence goes. There was nowhere to put this before, so people were adding it to their location field, which quietly confused the salary estimate and the region banner that read that field. No AI rewrite ever touches this line: what you type stays exactly as you typed it.
- And the privacy check still applies to it. Type “Nationality:” there and it gets flagged if you are applying to the UK or the US. The same detail that is expected in Zurich is one you may not want to send to London, and only you can decide that.
🗂️ Your Foundation, and One Place per Application
A job search produces two different kinds of work. There is the foundation: your master CV, your stories, who you are. And there are the applications, each with its own tailored CV, cover letter, questions and notes. They used to sit in one pile. Now they are separate.
Your CV library splits your master CV and base versions from the CVs tailored for specific jobs, grouped by the job each one was made for. Every job you track also gets its own workspace, with everything for that application on one screen, and opening a job from anywhere takes you straight there. The sidebar follows the same split. If you preferred the old one, you can switch back.
📖 Stories, in the Shape You Were Taught
STAR is not the only way to tell a work story, and it is not what every coach teaches. Your Story Bank now speaks five: STAR, SOAR, CARL, CAR and PAR. You pick one per story and the editor shows those boxes, with the names you already use.
CAR and PAR are the same three boxes under two vocabularies, and we kept both on purpose. If your coach taught you PAR, you were taught to start with the Problem, and being shown a box labelled “Challenge” is exactly the small friction this is meant to remove. Each method also has its own page explaining how it works and when it suits.
And a story can now be improved rather than just written. The editor asks a few questions about the parts that are thin, usually the ones where the result is vague or your own role is hard to see. Answer what you can, press Update my story, and you get a proposed rewrite:
- Nothing changes until you accept it. You see before and after for each part, and you can keep your own version of any piece you prefer.
- It can only use what you gave it. No invented numbers, names, dates or outcomes. If a figure appears in the rewrite that is nowhere in your story or your answers, it is caught before it reaches you.
- Vague answers do not get embellished. Where an answer does not really say anything new, it keeps your original wording rather than inventing something more impressive.
- Three updates per story per day, and an attempt that fails or times out does not count against them. Your answers are saved either way.
🎯 Weekly Goals From Your Coach
If you work with a coach, you can now set weekly goals together: jobs saved, applications, new contacts, conversations and LinkedIn posts. They sit on your dashboard as “This week’s goals from your coach”, and the week runs Monday to Sunday.
They fill in by themselves. Save a job, apply, add a contact, log a conversation or publish a post, and the count goes up. There is nothing to report back. Your coach sees the same week and gets a heads-up if things go quiet. Your next session can start from what actually happened, not from what either of you remembers.
🔒 Privacy, and Proof That the AI Is Fair
People put health conditions, religion, union membership and family details into CVs and stories without ever being asked for them. Some of it an employer is not allowed to ask about at all. We spent this month on how we handle that, and on proving it rather than promising it.
- A “before you send” check in the CV editor. It is the advice a good coach would give. Your date of birth, a religious or union role, or your photo are things an employer may not ask about. The editor lists anything like that on your CV, points to the line, and removes it in one click if you would rather it did not go out.
- A line wherever you hand over your own words, saying plainly what happens to them: uploading or pasting a CV, the audit bench, First CV including the voice interview, a new story, a coach questionnaire. One quiet line, with a link to the whole explanation.
- You are asked, not assumed. There is now an explicit consent for this kind of detail when you sign up, and a one-time notice for everyone who already had an account. Our privacy policy has been rewritten to cover it, in every language we support rather than English with translations bolted on.
- Date of birth, marital status and nationality no longer reach our AI. A lot of European CVs open with exactly those three lines. We already kept your contact details out of every prompt. Now these stay out too, in all six languages.
- A protected characteristic is never used, in either direction. Every prompt that reads your words now carries one rule: something you disclosed cannot drive a score, a gap, a piece of advice, or a strength. Being counted in your favour is still being counted.
And we test that, instead of asserting it. There are 48 test CVs across six languages. Each one is identical to a control except for a single line, disclosing something the way people actually write it: a parish, a union mandate, a board seat at a Rainbow Network, parental leave, a date of birth, a disability. They run through the real scoring, not a copy of it. The test fails if a score moves further than the normal run-to-run variation, or if the advice mentions the disclosure when the control’s advice does not.
It caught a real one. An Italian CV that mentioned using a screen reader had it listed under the candidate’s strengths, as evidence of a “strong technical product background”. Our rule at the time forbade counting a disclosure against you and said nothing about counting it for you, and a positive use is still a use. We fixed the rule, and the whole set now passes in all six languages.
- A plain page on what our AI sees, where it runs, and what it never does, including the result of that fairness test and the date it last ran. It is linked from the footer and from every box where you type something personal, so it is there when you need it rather than buried in a policy.
- Your voice practice is no longer used to train anyone’s models. Our voice partner had model training switched on for our account. We switched it off on 18 September. That covers everything recorded from that date on, and we would rather tell you that plainly than claim it never happened.